Skip to main content

Pixel vs DPI


A recent discussion about image theft from internet galleries spurred an impromptu lesson in image formatting for the internet. We talked about how to re-size and watermark images to deter illegal use of images. The conversation is worth expanding on and repeating here.

First let's define the two terms in the title; a pixel is a small square of colored light on a digital screen that, when viewed along side thousands of others, creates an image. Pixels are created by LEDs (light emitting diodes) assembled into an array called a screen (monitor, tv, touch screen, etc.)

DPI stands for dots per inch and refers to a small microscopic drop of colored ink deposited onto a substrate (paper, card stock, vinyl, cloth, etc.) through a series of ink jets. These drops are deposited in a prearranged order that, when viewed along side thousands of others, creates an image.

Each pixel or dot refers to a corresponding color captured on your camera's digital sensor, translated into binary code and stored as a digital file. That file is then read by your computer screen, laser printer, inkjet printer or other raster based output device as a photograph. In short, a pixel is an individual point of light on a digital screen while a DPI refers to a point of ink on a printable substrate.

The issue of the discussion was how to determine what size is suitable for a screen but unusable for print. The simple answer is dependent on what is being used to print out the image. There are three common output devices used for images; a computer screen, your home printer and a commercial photo printer. Each of these have their limitations in output. That output is measured in dots per inch or how many dots of color can fit across into an inch of paper.

Your computer screen displays at (typically) 72 dots per inch. Some will display at 96 dpi. The image at right is a one inch square image at 72 dpi. If your screen is rendering at 72 dpi and you take a ruler and measure this image it will be one inch. If your screen is rendering at 96 dpi the image here will measure at .75" across. (Make sure your browser's zoom is reset to the default setting.)

Printers, however, print at a higher resolution than a computer screen. Most home printers will print at 150 dots per inch but can go as high as 300 dpi. Commercial printers will normally print at 300 pdi but can go as high as 1200 dpi or more. So what does this mean for your images processed for video display?

The image at left is designed to display as a 4x6 inch photo on your 72 dpi screen (3x4.5 inches at 96 dpi). To display at that size the digital file needs to be 432 pixels wide and 288 pixels tall.

In order to have the same 4x6 inch image on paper from your home computer the digital file size needs to be 900 pixels wide by 600 pixels tall. That's more than double the size in pixels.

If you want to print that at your local photo kiosk that digital file now needs to be 1800 pixels wide by 1200 pixels tall. Twice over the size of the original file.

Let's reverse that; an image set for screen display at 4x6 (432x288 pixels) will print at a tiny size of 2.88" x 1.92" on your home printer (150 dpi) or the miniscule size of 1.44" x .96" at the kiosk (300 dpi). That last one is about the size of a large postage stamp and is not even a full inch tall.

So if you are formatting your images for your on line portfolio I usually recommend an image size between 600 and 800 pixels on the long edge. This gives enough detail to be appreciated on screen but will print a slightly pixelated 4x6 standard photo.

Keep in mind that if you upload your image at the native size (straight from you camera) most galleries will down-size the display size but may keep the original image size as is. So while on screen it may appear to be a small image, the downloaded size may be of higher quality suitable for printing at better resolutions. Always process your images before uploading to the web and make sure you scale your images accordingly.

While scaling down does not prevent someone from lifting your images for their own use it does offer a small level of deterrence. I suggest you further protect yourself by embedding your copyright information in the metadata of your files (see your camera manual or image editing software manual on how to accomplish this). For a more visual deterrent you can also watermark your images with your name as in the example at left.

Not only is this a deterrent for theft, it also associates your name with the image for potential clients. You never know who might be looking at your images.

To determine the final output size, in inches, of an image simply divide your image size in pixels by the dpi of the printer;
( px / dpi = x" )

Comments

Most Popular Posts

Upgrade Merry-go-round

Canon's release of their entry level full framed camera, the 6D, was a heralded event that received its fair share of anticipation, trepidation and arguments. I for one was looking forward to its arrival as I was in the market for a FF sensor but couldn't justify the cost of a 5D or 1D. Plus the fact that they have more features than I really need. When it came out I was one of the early buyers down at Milford Photo and before long I was unwrapping my new toy. Not soon after I discovered one of the hidden pitfalls of buying new gear; compatibility. In particular it was the compatibility with Adobe's Lightroom 3 which did not support the new 6D. " No problem, " I thought, " I'll just upgrade to LR4. " After all, the newest offering from Adobe promised some nice features I would appreciate. And this is where I got on the merry-go-round.

The Decisive Moment - a brief discussion

Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare, 1932 “Making a photograph means recognising, all at once and in a fraction of a second, an event and the exact organisation of the visually perceived forms that express and signify that event. It means aligning the head, the eye and the heart along the same line of sight. It’s a way of living.” Henri Cartier-Bresson Henri Cartier-Bresson (1908-2004) is credited for the expression, the decisive moment . The image at right, Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare , has become one of the most iconic of his images to represent that expression because it succinctly captures, in a single frame, the whole of his teachings. While there have been many discussions both casual and scholarly, like the image at right, his teachings has been oversimplified and distilled down to a short definition that, to me, has lost a lot of its original meaning or, as in some cases, completely missing the mark. Rather than getting into a lengthy dissertation on what Bresson consider...

Must have non-DIY photo equipment

When building up a collection of equipment for either a professional studio or a serious hobby studio, price is always a consideration. I am a big proponent to DIY equipment, specially if it can be crafted in a way that doesn't look home made. However, some things just can't be home made that a well stocked studio can't do without. Here is a small list of some of those little things you will always find yourself reaching for when doing studio work. Keep in mind that this is by no means an exhaustive list and there are some useable items I'll surely have forgotten to include. Feel free to add to the list in the comments section below.

Large DIY Diffusion Scrim

One of the most commonly used tools in my photographic arsenal is the all purpose diffusion screen . I use it to soften light, create gradients and light fields or as a background. One of my current favorites is a metal framed 4' x 4' foot scrim with thick white artificial silk made by Matthews. I didn't think I would use it so much, being so large, but having borrowed it from a friend I really came to love it. The downside for me is the price. At just over $100 I couldn't really justify the cost, considering I want at least two of them. Time for a DIY alternative.