Skip to main content

Assigning exposure values to your DIY diffusers


As a product photographer I am always tweaking or building light modifiers. Since lighting products is different than lighting people, I find that making my own modifiers is easier than trying to find commercially bought equipment. Plus, it's cheaper and, since I'm fairly handy, appeals to my artistic creativity.

With my collection of modifiers growing I thought I'd take inventory and also take stock in the various exposure factors of the modifiers. Specifically with in-line diffusers like diffuser screens and soft boxes.

Because the source materials for many diffusers come from a wide range of readily available products, knowing how much light a particular piece of material blocks can be a handy bit of information. So with no particular scientific procedure in mind I set out to determine light loss from the various types of materials I was using in my modifiers.

For a quick rundown of what I had to deal with here is a short sample of some of the materials I have in my collection; bed sheets, window sheers, shower curtains, wedding dress material, metal and nylon screens and a few other miscellaneous resources. You can see my use of window sheers and a piece of a hacked up shower curtain in the photo above.

This particular endeavor required my trusty incident meter and an open bulb light. I placed the meter at a typical working distance from my light of about two to three feet. I adjusted the distance until I got a reading of a full stop (in my case it was a reading of 5.6) from my meter. I then placed the various materials at the light source and took a second reading. Some simple math and I was able to determine the amount of light loss each modifier gave me. I then gave it an exposure value based on those results.

The reason I say this is a non-scientific method is that the light loss value actually changes depending on how close or far I place the modifier from the light (remember, Newton's inverse square law plays a major role here). In an actual working environment I usually just grab a diffuser and hold it up somewhere in between the light and the product. However, I did learn that the average difference of light loss under those situations was about +/- 1/3 of a stop. Not bad in my opinion.

As an example, if I take a reading on a piece of cloth and it reads f/4.0 I know I lost a full stop of light (f/5.6 minus f/4.0 is one full stop) or minus one exposure value. I also metered my shoot through umbrellas. At the light source the material metered at -.6 or two thirds of a stop loss of light. Since an umbrella is seldom held next to the light I figured the actual loss is closer to one full stop (give or take 1/3 of a stop).

While all this is not scientific in the least, it does give me a better handle on the diffusion capabilities of the different materials in use, specially when stacking materials to get a desired effect. A quick look at my EV rating I have assigned each piece of cloth gives me a rudimentary understanding of how it will behave when I hold it up to the light or double up on the material.

Do you use, or know of, a different method of classifying diffusion materials? If so, share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Comments

  1. I like that you are still playful and enjoy finding different solutions or as may be the obvious ones

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Post a comment only if it adds to the topic being discussed. Spam, hate or derogatory comments will not be allowed.

Most Popular Posts

Upgrade Merry-go-round

Canon's release of their entry level full framed camera, the 6D, was a heralded event that received its fair share of anticipation, trepidation and arguments. I for one was looking forward to its arrival as I was in the market for a FF sensor but couldn't justify the cost of a 5D or 1D. Plus the fact that they have more features than I really need. When it came out I was one of the early buyers down at Milford Photo and before long I was unwrapping my new toy. Not soon after I discovered one of the hidden pitfalls of buying new gear; compatibility. In particular it was the compatibility with Adobe's Lightroom 3 which did not support the new 6D. " No problem, " I thought, " I'll just upgrade to LR4. " After all, the newest offering from Adobe promised some nice features I would appreciate. And this is where I got on the merry-go-round.

The Decisive Moment - a brief discussion

Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare, 1932 “Making a photograph means recognising, all at once and in a fraction of a second, an event and the exact organisation of the visually perceived forms that express and signify that event. It means aligning the head, the eye and the heart along the same line of sight. It’s a way of living.” Henri Cartier-Bresson Henri Cartier-Bresson (1908-2004) is credited for the expression, the decisive moment . The image at right, Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare , has become one of the most iconic of his images to represent that expression because it succinctly captures, in a single frame, the whole of his teachings. While there have been many discussions both casual and scholarly, like the image at right, his teachings has been oversimplified and distilled down to a short definition that, to me, has lost a lot of its original meaning or, as in some cases, completely missing the mark. Rather than getting into a lengthy dissertation on what Bresson consider...

Large DIY Diffusion Scrim

One of the most commonly used tools in my photographic arsenal is the all purpose diffusion screen . I use it to soften light, create gradients and light fields or as a background. One of my current favorites is a metal framed 4' x 4' foot scrim with thick white artificial silk made by Matthews. I didn't think I would use it so much, being so large, but having borrowed it from a friend I really came to love it. The downside for me is the price. At just over $100 I couldn't really justify the cost, considering I want at least two of them. Time for a DIY alternative.

Must have non-DIY photo equipment

When building up a collection of equipment for either a professional studio or a serious hobby studio, price is always a consideration. I am a big proponent to DIY equipment, specially if it can be crafted in a way that doesn't look home made. However, some things just can't be home made that a well stocked studio can't do without. Here is a small list of some of those little things you will always find yourself reaching for when doing studio work. Keep in mind that this is by no means an exhaustive list and there are some useable items I'll surely have forgotten to include. Feel free to add to the list in the comments section below.