Skip to main content

Your photographic language, part 2


Vis-su-al Lan-guage - noun ( vi-zhe-wel lan-gwij )
  1. something (as a graphic) that appeals to the sight and is used as a system of communication of ideas or concepts
  2. the notion that colors, shapes and forms have intrinsic meaning within a given society that words are not needed in expressing those meanings
Previously we discussed photographic language as a series of industry specific definitions that make communication among peers easier to comprehend (Your photographic language, part 1). Through the use of clearly defined terms we can understand lessons and concepts that deal with photography effectively making conversation easier.

The other side of the coin is what is termed visual language and that is a much tougher language to learn. Visual language does not deal in words that have clearly defined definitions. It deals with impalpable concepts such as mood and feelings and perceptions. It is the mastery over this language that defines the true artist and separates them from the novice. But what is this visual language and how can we learn it?

First let me give you the bad news... some artists spend their whole entire lives trying to understand it. Ansel Adams spent a large portion of his life trying to define it. Anne Geddes honed it into financial success. Annie Leibovitz pushed its boundaries, raising the bar on future fashion photographers... and I'm only in the "A's" of famous photographers. The chance of you fully understanding it is slim to none without a lot of hard work. That is the one element all these artists have in common, but I digress.

We all have a certain amount of knowledge when it comes to visual language because it is part of our society. We are exposed to it on a daily level and from an early age. Here is a short, simple test to prove the point. Answer these questions without scrolling down for the answers;
  1. What gender is "pink"?
  2. What temperature is "blue"?
  3. What emotion is "red"?
Not the most comprehensive test, but it helps to illustrate a point. Do you have your answers? Are you sure?

"Pink" is not a gender, "blue" is not a temperature and "red" is not an emotion. If you answered "girl", "cold" and "anger" you passed the visual language test. These are associations we understand to be represented by those colors. If you stand a boy and a girl next to each other there is nothing "pink" about her that is not on the boy. Same goes with "blue" as a masculine color. Society has deemed that those colors be representative of those genders.

As I said, it is a simple test therefore a simple example. However, when you start delving deeper into the language of photography you will begin to see the complexity of it. As you learn you will also begin to see the connections between all the symbols.

Here is an exercise in more complex visual thinking. Below is a short list of items. By themselves they are rather mundane, some are insignificant and many are commonplace. The first part of the exercise is to read the list one item at a time and visualize the item. We'll get to part two of the exercise after the list.
  1. train
  2. lamp post
  3. suitcase
  4. puddle
Now put all four elements together into a scene. Is the scene a happy one or a sad one? Is the scene full of people or a solitary figure? Is the train coming or going? What is the weather doing? Where is the suitcase in relation to everything else? What gender is the owner of the suitcase?

Amazing what our minds can do with a little suggestion. If your are a strong visual thinker you probably created a whole diorama around those four items. Now let's see how close I manipulated your scene. If I'm right, your scene is of a person the same gender as you who is feeling sad about leaving, possibly sitting on their suit case or holding it in a melancholic manner. They are alone on the platform of a train station on a rainy night.

If this is the scene you envisioned then you understand that a train symbolizes a journey, adventure, travel, communing to or away from your location, the exotic. A lamp post signifies illumination, lighting a path, loneliness, finding your way, guidance, isolation. A suitcase represents travel, ownership, possessions, displacement, journey, adventure, the unknown. A puddle is symbolic of childhood, depression, sadness, mischief, change.

Based on those predetermined associations I can guess that the majority of people reading this post will come to the conclusion I gave above. As for gender, we tend to project ourselves into our scenes. If you didn't come to the same conclusion don't worry. It doesn't mean you "don't get it", it could just mean you think further outside the box than others.

These examples just scratch the surface of what can be done with a strong knowledge of visual language. The nuances can be subtle, almost imperceptible when created by a true artist. But there is also an energy when done by someone who is exploring their voice. There is something to be said about blind exploration too, as long as you have the courage to explore.

Photographic language is further enhanced, or manipulated, by the technology itself. Processing and printing techniques further push the possibilities of expression. Through the use of photographic tools such as editing programs you can create visions not represented by nature alone. Imagination can step in to further the playing field. All this adds to and enhances your visual language. The key is to start developing that vocabulary.

This is done by studying other people's work. Not just photographers either. There is a lot to be learned from painters and film makers, sculptors and other visual artists. Begin by looking at the works of artists that appeal to you visually. Don't just look at their work but rather, see their work. Analyze it, take it apart, separate it into their basic components and put them back together. Try replicating it yourself and when you fail (notice I said when) don't give up. Try it again.

Before long you will start building a library of symbols that work and flow and create ideas and suggest concepts or evoke emotions. These will become elements in you palette when you start making images and not just taking them.

So, off you go, with visions of... who knows what... in your head. Go off and create.

Comments

Most Popular Posts

Upgrade Merry-go-round

Canon's release of their entry level full framed camera, the 6D, was a heralded event that received its fair share of anticipation, trepidation and arguments. I for one was looking forward to its arrival as I was in the market for a FF sensor but couldn't justify the cost of a 5D or 1D. Plus the fact that they have more features than I really need. When it came out I was one of the early buyers down at Milford Photo and before long I was unwrapping my new toy. Not soon after I discovered one of the hidden pitfalls of buying new gear; compatibility. In particular it was the compatibility with Adobe's Lightroom 3 which did not support the new 6D. " No problem, " I thought, " I'll just upgrade to LR4. " After all, the newest offering from Adobe promised some nice features I would appreciate. And this is where I got on the merry-go-round.

The Decisive Moment - a brief discussion

Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare, 1932 “Making a photograph means recognising, all at once and in a fraction of a second, an event and the exact organisation of the visually perceived forms that express and signify that event. It means aligning the head, the eye and the heart along the same line of sight. It’s a way of living.” Henri Cartier-Bresson Henri Cartier-Bresson (1908-2004) is credited for the expression, the decisive moment . The image at right, Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare , has become one of the most iconic of his images to represent that expression because it succinctly captures, in a single frame, the whole of his teachings. While there have been many discussions both casual and scholarly, like the image at right, his teachings has been oversimplified and distilled down to a short definition that, to me, has lost a lot of its original meaning or, as in some cases, completely missing the mark. Rather than getting into a lengthy dissertation on what Bresson consider...

Must have non-DIY photo equipment

When building up a collection of equipment for either a professional studio or a serious hobby studio, price is always a consideration. I am a big proponent to DIY equipment, specially if it can be crafted in a way that doesn't look home made. However, some things just can't be home made that a well stocked studio can't do without. Here is a small list of some of those little things you will always find yourself reaching for when doing studio work. Keep in mind that this is by no means an exhaustive list and there are some useable items I'll surely have forgotten to include. Feel free to add to the list in the comments section below.

Large DIY Diffusion Scrim

One of the most commonly used tools in my photographic arsenal is the all purpose diffusion screen . I use it to soften light, create gradients and light fields or as a background. One of my current favorites is a metal framed 4' x 4' foot scrim with thick white artificial silk made by Matthews. I didn't think I would use it so much, being so large, but having borrowed it from a friend I really came to love it. The downside for me is the price. At just over $100 I couldn't really justify the cost, considering I want at least two of them. Time for a DIY alternative.