Skip to main content

Levels of photography


I got to thinking about the progress a photographer makes through the learning curve of this crazy business/hobby/obsession we have so wittingly embraced. I tried to analyze not so much the progress of learning but more of the progress of the finished product that comes out of the camera. That progress obviously increasing in technical ability as well as artistic ability.

Anyway, here are the levels I came up with. Keep in mind that these are not based on any standards and are just my opinion. Also understand that while we may move forward in our learning we are also guilty of 'backsliding' into the lower levels. After all, they do have a place in our photo albums. You know, the ones we keep to ourselves... Enjoy.

Documentary shot; This type of photo has no artistic intention. It is simply a photo taken to document an event, item or subject. There's seldom any thought about lighting, or artistic perspective. Composition choices are based on considering which view shows the most amount of information. The photo of your car after the accident for the insurance company or the electrical panel as you go shopping at the hardware store are some examples.

Snapshot; A snapshot is the most common form of picture taking. It is often a 'reactionary' form of photography where the photographer sees an event and quickly frames and exposes for whatever is happening at the time. You see these posted on Facebook and emailed to family members. The cliche-ish duck-face in the mirror self-portrait is a glaring example of the worst kind of snapshot.

Brag shot; When the decision is made to go from a snap shooter into more serious photography is made a conscious effort is made to start wrestling with the creative and technical end of photography. This is when the foray into 'making' a photo, not just reacting to one, sometimes results in a surprise. That one shot out of a hundred that makes friends say, "wow, you have a great eye. You should be a professional."

Consistently technical shot; A level of proficiency has been attained where there is consistently good quality photographs. These photographs no longer wrestles with the technical settings but concentrate on working the creative aspect. The routine stuff is what earns the money but the images still miss that spark those famous photographers everyone admires seem to get.

Commercial shot; Either product or fashion, these shots need to have a higher level of technical skill and artistry. So much is put into a single image that if they weren't selling something they could very well be on a gallery wall. These are the true money makers of the professional photographer. They often have a signature look representative of the photographer that took it.

Gallery shot; This is probably the top of the heap. These are the truly artistically expressive images that people pay serious money to collect. They often adorn gallery walls and thick expensive coffee table books. Images like these are definitely a labor of love as they often cost more to produce than the returns on them, though it does open doors to more work.

Comments

Most Popular Posts

Large DIY Diffusion Scrim

One of the most commonly used tools in my photographic arsenal is the all purpose diffusion screen . I use it to soften light, create gradients and light fields or as a background. One of my current favorites is a metal framed 4' x 4' foot scrim with thick white artificial silk made by Matthews. I didn't think I would use it so much, being so large, but having borrowed it from a friend I really came to love it. The downside for me is the price. At just over $100 I couldn't really justify the cost, considering I want at least two of them. Time for a DIY alternative.

Upgrade Merry-go-round

Canon's release of their entry level full framed camera, the 6D, was a heralded event that received its fair share of anticipation, trepidation and arguments. I for one was looking forward to its arrival as I was in the market for a FF sensor but couldn't justify the cost of a 5D or 1D. Plus the fact that they have more features than I really need. When it came out I was one of the early buyers down at Milford Photo and before long I was unwrapping my new toy. Not soon after I discovered one of the hidden pitfalls of buying new gear; compatibility. In particular it was the compatibility with Adobe's Lightroom 3 which did not support the new 6D. " No problem, " I thought, " I'll just upgrade to LR4. " After all, the newest offering from Adobe promised some nice features I would appreciate. And this is where I got on the merry-go-round.

Must have non-DIY photo equipment

When building up a collection of equipment for either a professional studio or a serious hobby studio, price is always a consideration. I am a big proponent to DIY equipment, specially if it can be crafted in a way that doesn't look home made. However, some things just can't be home made that a well stocked studio can't do without. Here is a small list of some of those little things you will always find yourself reaching for when doing studio work. Keep in mind that this is by no means an exhaustive list and there are some useable items I'll surely have forgotten to include. Feel free to add to the list in the comments section below.

The Decisive Moment - a brief discussion

Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare, 1932 “Making a photograph means recognising, all at once and in a fraction of a second, an event and the exact organisation of the visually perceived forms that express and signify that event. It means aligning the head, the eye and the heart along the same line of sight. It’s a way of living.” Henri Cartier-Bresson Henri Cartier-Bresson (1908-2004) is credited for the expression, the decisive moment . The image at right, Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare , has become one of the most iconic of his images to represent that expression because it succinctly captures, in a single frame, the whole of his teachings. While there have been many discussions both casual and scholarly, like the image at right, his teachings has been oversimplified and distilled down to a short definition that, to me, has lost a lot of its original meaning or, as in some cases, completely missing the mark. Rather than getting into a lengthy dissertation on what Bresson consider