Skip to main content

A brief discussion on aspect ratios


Aspect ratio refers to the relationship of the width of an image to its length independent of the actual size. Aspects are typically written as two numbers separated by a colon; i.e 3:2, 4:3, 16:9, etc., where the first number represents the width. While it's not crucial to have a full understanding of ratios and how they are calculated, it does make sense to have at least a passing knowledge. "Why?" I hear you ask. The answer, in a nutshell, is this; if you plan on printing your images you need to understand what will fit into your picture frame. Let me explain.

Most micro four thirds digital camera sensors use a 4:3 aspect ratio. In simple terms this means your image can be four inches by three inches. It can also be four centimeters by three centimeters. Digital SLR cameras use a more favorable 3:2 aspect. Again, this gives us three inches by two inches. While that's not a realistic size with some simple math you can infer that a 3:2 aspect will yield a 6x4, 9x6, 12x8 or even a 7x4.6 or 10x6.6 photo. "So what?" I hear you ask further. Well, looking at some of those numbers we can deduce that they don't fit easily into standardized, ready-to-hang, off-the-shelf picture frames.

We are all familiar with the standard picture frames available; 4x6, 5x7, 8x10, 11x17 and (now that we have digital printing) 8.5x11. These dimensions have been around a very long time but they all (but one - 6x4) don't fit into the same aspect ratio of our camera's sensor. That means something has to be cropped out, either top, bottom or both or even the sides. Let's take a dSLR's 3:2 sensor and one of my favorite print sizes, the 8x10.

I love 8x10 images as they are large enough to allow me to enjoy the image but not so large that it hogs wall space or sucks the life out of my wallet (not the printing but the frame cost). In most cases I'll buy a larger frame that comes with a pre cut mat. Both my full frame and my APS-C crop cameras have an aspect ratio of 3:2. Without cropping I can get an eight inch by 12 inch image. That's two inches taller than my favorite 8x10 frame size. Two inches I have to crop out of my image and that is a lot to lose if you don't plan for it.

If I were to take a photo with a point and shoot that has the 4:3 aspect ratio and I wanted an 8x10 I would be closer to my goal. At this ratio I would get an 8x10.6 inch image size. I would only be losing a little over half an inch in this case. This tells me that if I shoot with my dSLR I have to allow for cropping on the short sides while with my point and shoot I will need to consider a bit on the long sides.

For a 5x7 print with my 4:3 point and shoot I'll only have to lose a quarter of an inch on the long sides. Not bad. I can easily live with that even if I forget to allow for it. With my dSLR I'll be losing a half inch on the short side. A rather larger margin of error. While not considerably an image killer, losing a part of your image can become significant when you are already cropping in tight with your original composition. So when you are out there shooting, consider your crop factor in relation to your sensor's aspect ratio. You don't want to end up having to sacrifice important image information because you didn't allow enough room in your original composition.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Post a comment only if it adds to the topic being discussed. Spam, hate or derogatory comments will not be allowed.

Most Popular Posts

Upgrade Merry-go-round

Canon's release of their entry level full framed camera, the 6D, was a heralded event that received its fair share of anticipation, trepidation and arguments. I for one was looking forward to its arrival as I was in the market for a FF sensor but couldn't justify the cost of a 5D or 1D. Plus the fact that they have more features than I really need. When it came out I was one of the early buyers down at Milford Photo and before long I was unwrapping my new toy. Not soon after I discovered one of the hidden pitfalls of buying new gear; compatibility. In particular it was the compatibility with Adobe's Lightroom 3 which did not support the new 6D. " No problem, " I thought, " I'll just upgrade to LR4. " After all, the newest offering from Adobe promised some nice features I would appreciate. And this is where I got on the merry-go-round.
5 comments
Read More »

The Decisive Moment - a brief discussion

Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare, 1932 “Making a photograph means recognising, all at once and in a fraction of a second, an event and the exact organisation of the visually perceived forms that express and signify that event. It means aligning the head, the eye and the heart along the same line of sight. It’s a way of living.” Henri Cartier-Bresson Henri Cartier-Bresson (1908-2004) is credited for the expression, the decisive moment . The image at right, Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare , has become one of the most iconic of his images to represent that expression because it succinctly captures, in a single frame, the whole of his teachings. While there have been many discussions both casual and scholarly, like the image at right, his teachings has been oversimplified and distilled down to a short definition that, to me, has lost a lot of its original meaning or, as in some cases, completely missing the mark. Rather than getting into a lengthy dissertation on what Bresson consider...
4 comments
Read More »

Large DIY Diffusion Scrim

One of the most commonly used tools in my photographic arsenal is the all purpose diffusion screen . I use it to soften light, create gradients and light fields or as a background. One of my current favorites is a metal framed 4' x 4' foot scrim with thick white artificial silk made by Matthews. I didn't think I would use it so much, being so large, but having borrowed it from a friend I really came to love it. The downside for me is the price. At just over $100 I couldn't really justify the cost, considering I want at least two of them. Time for a DIY alternative.
2 comments
Read More »

Must have non-DIY photo equipment

When building up a collection of equipment for either a professional studio or a serious hobby studio, price is always a consideration. I am a big proponent to DIY equipment, specially if it can be crafted in a way that doesn't look home made. However, some things just can't be home made that a well stocked studio can't do without. Here is a small list of some of those little things you will always find yourself reaching for when doing studio work. Keep in mind that this is by no means an exhaustive list and there are some useable items I'll surely have forgotten to include. Feel free to add to the list in the comments section below.
4 comments
Read More »