Skip to main content

Age old argument; RAW or JPEG


It seems that this argument can be found on nearly every blog about photography. While it has been argued to no end, here is my take on the subject.

Shooting in RAW has many advantages over JPEG as it records far more image information than a JPEG image ever can. Understanding that, it makes sense to shoot in RAW all the time. If you need a JPEG (or any other image format for that matter) you can very easily convert the RAW file to the needed format. The same can not be said about going the other way; you can't create a RAW file from a JPEG.

The only downside to shooting RAW is in the write speed of some cameras. Being a larger file it takes a little longer to write the image file to the flash card. While it boils down to a difference of just a few milliseconds, when you need to shoot fast, this delay can work against you. So if you absolutely must shoot for speed, shoot in JPEG. Just remember your post editing abilities will be narrowed to the RGB editing controls.

Which leads me to another argument I've heard people mention about why they don't shoot RAW. "I really don't know how to use those 'high-end' editing programs that edit RAW."

While your editing abilities may be lacking right now, they will get better. It is not unusual for photographers to revisit older work as their skill level advances. That image you thought was not salvageable yesterday can be a diamond in the rough tomorrow. Which reminds me of a little tip I learned a long time ago and that is to not delete unwanted images.

"But they take up so much room," some may argue. Yes, it is true that RAW files are significantly larger than a JPEG file. However, my rebuttal to this is that all image files take up room. If you are going to be a serious photographer you will need to invest in some form of data backup system. These systems are becoming less and less expensive, so having to keep a few 'unwanted' images in storage should not be an excuse.

So overall what is the verdict?
PROS:
  • flexibility - convert to various image formats
  • edit-ability - greater range of image editing over other formats
CONS:
  • size - larger file size uses more storage resources
  • speed - because of larger file size saving to disc takes longer
In my opinion, the pros far outweigh the cons. Looking back at some of my earlier shots taken in JPEG I wish I had the RAW files available for editing. Knowing what I know now, I could have easily saved many of them. Live and learn, so shoot RAW and save yourself some future regrets.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Post a comment only if it adds to the topic being discussed. Spam, hate or derogatory comments will not be allowed.

Most Popular Posts

Large DIY Diffusion Scrim

One of the most commonly used tools in my photographic arsenal is the all purpose diffusion screen . I use it to soften light, create gradients and light fields or as a background. One of my current favorites is a metal framed 4' x 4' foot scrim with thick white artificial silk made by Matthews. I didn't think I would use it so much, being so large, but having borrowed it from a friend I really came to love it. The downside for me is the price. At just over $100 I couldn't really justify the cost, considering I want at least two of them. Time for a DIY alternative.
2 comments
Read More »

Don Julio - Hero Shot

For starters, a hero shot is one in which the product is showcased in all its splendor. Careful attention is placed on making the product look its very best. For this shot of Don Julio I knew I wanted to give the bottle some majesty by photographing it from a low angle. That low angle makes the bottle look tall, towering over the viewer and creating a position of dominance. Can't you hear the choir of angels singing in the background? I also knew that I wanted a rich, moody image with lots of darks. I am partial to darker images, which is surprising to most people because the majority of the work I do are images on white backgrounds. But that's another story. I also tried a lifestyle type shot with glasses and lime slices but I wasn't feeling it and ended up scrapping it. Again, that's another story.
Post a Comment
Read More »

Observations on composition - Pieter Bruegel

In this article I am reprinting a critique I published on photoMENTORIS.com regarding the painting entitled ' Census at Bethlehem ' by famed painter Pieter Bruegel , who was born in what is now the Netherlands in the 1520s. The first point I would like to say is that you first need to consider both the medium and the time frame of this painting. Being a painting, the artist has a certain advantage of being able to carefully direct the large amount of content presented to the viewer, unlike, say, a photo of opportunity of the street photographer (I strongly believe Pieter would have been the 'street photographer' of his time). Even a studio photographer, with the luxury of space and time, would have a hard time justifying creating such a complex composition. Where you would see this type of visual composition today would be in modern cinema. In particular, period pieces that rely on background elements to "sell the era" .  Secondly, the era in which thi
Post a Comment
Read More »

Friends, Photos and Central Park

A good friend, and fellow photographer, Letif Belcher (of letif.b.photo on Instagram) was in my studio recently doing some headshots for a young female actress client of his. The topic of New York came up and he mentioned wanting to take the trip in for some street photography. I love getting into the city with my camera and mentioned to him that it's been a while since I've been there. A couple days later and we had a trip planned to hit Central Park. Letif and I took the train into Grand Central last Friday and, cameras in hand, headed uptown to the park. As he'd never been there I planned out a few 'must see' spots to hit. Our first stop would be the famous LOVE art installation on the corner of 6th and 55th. Much to my dismay, the sculpture was "out for repair". Off to a bad start.
Post a Comment
Read More »